The calls you made, with the reasoning attached
A short note written at the time, saying what you chose, what you rejected and what you were worried about, is worth more than any artefact produced afterwards.
Accreditation at the Institute of AI is assessed on practice. Almost everyone who struggles with that has done the work and simply cannot reconstruct the reasoning a year after the fact.
None of this requires a side project or a public portfolio. All four come out of the AI work you are already doing, if you write them down as you go.
A short note written at the time, saying what you chose, what you rejected and what you were worried about, is worth more than any artefact produced afterwards.
Assessors read recoveries closely. A clear account of an approach that failed, why you spotted it, and what you did next demonstrates practice that a clean success story cannot.
The evaluation you designed, the outcome it was tied to, and what you did when the numbers disagreed with the expectation in the room.
The bias check you ran, the data you refused to use, the escalation you raised. Governance evidence is strongest when it is specific and unflattering.
The free self-assessment tells you which level your practice supports today, which is what turns a vague habit of note-keeping into a deliberate one. Joining the Institute of AI as a Member is free as well.
The five dimensions your evidence has to answer for, and what the assessment deliberately ignores.
An honest account of the bar at each grade, and the evidence that will not carry one.
A couple of minutes, no account, no cost, and you know which grade your practice supports.