Skip to content
About · Professional Code of Ethics · Version 2026.1

Seven principles every member stands behind.

A short, public oath written to be lived by. The Code of Ethics is the professional standard that sits behind every IoAI accreditation, every Charter signature, and every piece of work that carries a member's name. Five minutes to read, binding for as long as you hold the credential.

Seven principles
One paragraph each, no carve-outs
5 minutes
Plain English, no legalese
Every member
Binding at every accreditation level
Reviewed annually
By the IoAI Standards Council
We are the people building, deploying, governing, and teaching artificial intelligence in the United Kingdom. The technology is powerful. Our duties to the people it touches are larger still.
— The IoAI membership · The code we hold ourselves, and each other, accountable to
— The seven principles —

What every member
stands for.

Seven principles, one paragraph each. No legalese, no footnotes, no hidden carve-outs. Read them and you know exactly what an IoAI member has agreed to.

  1. Principle I

    Integrity

    Members are honest about what AI can and cannot do, what they know and do not know, and where their work begins and ends. We do not oversell, ghost-write our credentials, or hide our limits.

    • Truthful claims with sourced numbers, including the model and method behind any benchmark result
    • Disclosure when generative AI shaped a piece of work that carries our name
    • Mistakes corrected in writing, with the same reach as the original claim

    “I will not say more than I know.”

  2. Principle II

    Responsibility

    Members own the AI systems they design, deploy, or recommend — through to the consequences for the people on the other side of the screen. Outsourcing the model does not outsource the duty.

    • A named human accountable for every production decision a member ships
    • A written record of who signed off on which release
    • Rollback plans designed before launch, not after the first incident

    “I will own the outcomes of what I build.”

  3. Principle III

    Fairness

    Members work to ensure AI systems treat people equitably across protected characteristics, postcodes, and life circumstances. We do not let convenient datasets quietly reproduce historical harm.

    • Bias tested, documented, and mitigated before release — and re-tested as the world changes
    • Disaggregated performance metrics in every model card
    • No system ships whose error rate falls disproportionately on a protected group

    “I will measure who pays the cost of my errors.”

  4. Principle IV

    Privacy

    Members protect the personal data passed through the systems they touch. We collect what is necessary, hold it as briefly as the work allows, and never repurpose it without consent.

    • Data minimisation as the default, not an audit-time scramble
    • Synthetic or anonymised data wherever the use case permits
    • A documented retention schedule for every dataset under our care

    “I will treat the data I touch as if it belonged to my family.”

  5. Principle V

    Safety

    Members do not ship AI systems whose failure modes have not been thought through. We red-team, we monitor, and we hold the launch when the evidence is not yet there.

    • A pre-launch adversarial review for any user-facing model
    • Live monitoring of safety-relevant signals, with thresholds agreed in advance
    • A standing right to delay release without commercial penalty

    “I will hold the launch if the evidence is not there.”

  6. Principle VI

    Continuous learning

    AI changes quickly, and so must the people working in it. Members keep their practice current and share what they learn with peers, juniors, and the public.

    • Recorded continuing professional development every accreditation cycle
    • At least one public contribution a year — a talk, a paper, a clinic, a mentoring relationship
    • Honest peer review, given and received

    “I will keep learning, and I will pass it on.”

  7. Principle VII

    Public interest

    When a commercial duty conflicts with the safety, dignity, or autonomy of the public, the public interest comes first. The credential is for service, not insulation.

    • Members speak up — internally first, externally if required — when a system risks meaningful harm
    • Whistleblower support through the IoAI Standards Council
    • Support for colleagues who raise concerns in good faith

    “I will put the public ahead of the brief, when the brief is wrong.”

Signed at enrolment, re-affirmed at every annual renewal.

— Who is bound —

Three groups, one
standard.

Accredited members

Everyone holding a personal IoAI accreditation — Student, Associate, Professional, or Fellow. The Code is signed at enrolment and re-affirmed at every annual renewal.

See the accreditation pathway

Accredited organisations

Companies, charities, schools, and public bodies holding an organisation accreditation. A senior responsible owner signs the Code on behalf of the organisation and answers for it.

About organisation accreditation

Charter signatories

Every UK AI Readiness Charter signatory adopts the principles as a public commitment, published on a public verification page and re-affirmed each year.

Read the Charter

The Code applies the moment you pick up an IoAI credential or sign the Charter. No tier, no exception, no “industry adjustment”.

— Enforcement —

A code is only as serious as the process behind it. Every concern raised in good faith reaches the same four-stage review.

  1. 01
    Concern

    Anyone — member, signatory, or member of the public — can raise a concern by email or through the secure form. Every report gets a named caseworker.

    Acknowledged within 3 working days
  2. 02
    Review

    A two-person panel reviews the case against the seven principles and gives the member named in the concern a written opportunity to respond.

    Typically completed within 6 weeks
  3. 03
    Findings

    The panel issues written findings: which principles were considered, what the evidence showed, and a recommended outcome. Both parties receive them.

    Issued within 14 days of review close
  4. 04
    Outcome

    Outcomes range from no further action to withdrawal of accreditation, always with a reasoned explanation and a right of appeal to an independent reviewer.

    28-day appeal window
No further action

Concern not upheld; case closed with written rationale.

Private guidance

Reflective letter and required reading. No public record.

Formal censure

Reprimand on file and a one-year probationary period.

Withdrawal of accreditation

Member removed, and their public verification page withdrawn.

Every concern is acknowledged in writing, with a named caseworker. Anonymous reports are accepted.

— Standards team —

Seen somethingthat falls short?

If you believe a member has fallen short of the Code, tell us. Concerns are read by the Standards team within three working days and confidentiality is the default. Not a complaint, just a question about how the Code applies? Ask the same team.

Read it in five minutes.
Carry it for a career.

The Code comes to life the day you sign it. Start your accreditation, or put your organisation's name to the Charter.