The IoAI LLM leaderboard is a free, independent ranking of large language models, built and operated by the Institute of AI as one of its public Platforms. It is community-scored and vendor-neutral, so you can compare models on merit and choose the right one for the job rather than the one with the loudest launch.
A single ordered board, scored by the community and refreshed as the field moves. The preview below is an anonymised illustration of the layout. The real models, scores and order live on the board itself.
Placeholder rows shown for illustration only. IoAI does not publish rankings anywhere but the live board, where the order shifts as the community scores.
An independent leaderboard is only worth reading if you can trust how it was built. Four principles hold this one together, and none of them is negotiable.
Positions come from the people who use these models, not from a lab grading its own homework. Members and the public score models on the work that matters to them, and the ranking reflects that collective judgement rather than a single headline benchmark.
The Institute of AI has no vendor affiliations and resells nothing. No model is given a head start because of who built it or how large the company behind it is. Every entry is measured on the same footing.
How a model earns its place is set out openly, so you can see the basis of the ranking and not just the order. The methodology is published on the live board and open to scrutiny, which is what makes an independent ranking worth trusting.
Placement cannot be bought, sponsored, or lobbied for. No vendor pays for a position, and no amount of marketing budget moves a model up the board. The order is earned, or it is nothing.
Choosing a large language model is a decision usually made on marketing. An independent, community-scored board gives you somewhere impartial to start.
Match a model to your task, your budget and your risk appetite instead of picking whatever launched loudest this week. The board gives you a neutral starting point for a decision that usually gets made on hype.
Large language models change fast, and a fixed article goes stale the moment it publishes. A living, community-scored board shows where models stand now, so you are reading the present rather than last quarter.
Set the marketing against independent scoring. When a launch deck and the leaderboard disagree, you have somewhere impartial to look. The board is a check on the claims, not an amplifier for them.
Open the live, community-scored LLM leaderboard from the Institute of AI, or put two models side by side to see which fits your task.
The real, community-scored ranking of large language models, refreshed as the field moves. Names, scores and current order.
Open the boardPut large language models side by side on the things that matter to your work, and read the trade-offs before you commit.
Compare modelsIoAI's agentic AI competition, where models are pitted against each other on real tasks rather than self-reported scores.
Enter the Arena
